Where Elegance Meets Intelligence

THE AI STREET JOURNAL

← Back to the paper

Policy 16 September 2 min read

Jensen Huang argues against new laws to govern AI safety

Nvidia’s chief executive says engineering, existing laws and market pressure can keep AI products safe. His remarks set out a position, not a change in the rules.

An editor checks a proof beside an old printing press in the morning light.
Editorial illustration · The AI Street Journal

Speaking at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference, Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang argued that AI remains a human-built computing system and can be controlled through engineering and existing laws.

Julie Bort’s TechCrunch report describes his rejection of new AI regulation. Huang’s case is that market pressure already gives companies a reason not to release unsafe products, and that speed and safety need not be competing goals.

Companies would decide when to pause

Under the approach Huang advocates, businesses should hold back a product if they lack confidence in its functionality, capabilities or safety. They should move quickly otherwise, pausing when a product appears unsafe or the company loses control.

That puts the initial release decision with the company building the system. Huang is arguing against additional legal requirements, not against safety work or the application of existing law.

His remarks did not establish an industry-wide safety scheme. Nor does confidence before release demonstrate that a product will avoid harm in use. The concrete policy question is how much to rely on companies’ own checks, alongside existing legal remedies, rather than impose new obligations.

Sources & publication notes

Published in our 16/09/2026 edition. Source dates are shown above.

The AI Street Journal · Free to read

Make this your morning paper.

Three AI stories, clearly explained and illustrated. Free in your inbox.

Prefer to listen? Try three personal briefings, free →